Laws against synthesis and other related crimes: Difference between revisions
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) + = Denmark = Denmark is currently considering changing its laws so that each Dane would have copyright over their own appearance and voice. |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) →Denmark: + The Danish approach is novel because it creates a w:property right in one’s biometric identity, treating voice/appearance like w:intellectual property |
||
| Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
= Denmark = | = Denmark = | ||
Denmark is currently considering changing its laws so that each Dane would have copyright over their own appearance and voice. | Denmark is currently considering changing its laws so that each Dane would have copyright over their own appearance and voice. The Danish approach is novel because it creates a [[w:Right to property|w:property right]] in one’s biometric identity, treating voice/appearance like [[w:intellectual property]], whereas the previous legislative steps elsewhere have been harms-based. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
= EU = | = EU = | ||
[[File:Flag of Europe.svg|thumb|right|200px|The EU must address the malicious uses of AI in the law it is planning to regulate AI.]] | [[File:Flag of Europe.svg|thumb|right|200px|The EU must address the malicious uses of AI in the law it is planning to regulate AI.]] | ||