Laws against synthesis and other related crimes: Difference between revisions
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) →Denmark: + The Danish approach is novel because it creates a w:property right in one’s biometric identity, treating voice/appearance like w:intellectual property |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
= Denmark = | = Denmark = | ||
[[File:Animated flag GIFGIFs Denmark.gif|thumb|right|300px|Denmark is considering a novel approach against synthetic filth, by planning to give Danes copyright over their own appearance and voice, a shift from previous legislative approaches against [[synthetic human-like fakes]].]] | |||
Denmark is currently considering changing its laws so that each Dane would have copyright over their own appearance and voice. The Danish approach is novel because it creates a [[w:Right to property|w:property right]] in one’s biometric identity, treating voice/appearance like [[w:intellectual property]], whereas the previous legislative steps elsewhere have been harms-based. | Denmark is currently considering changing its laws so that each Dane would have copyright over their own appearance and voice. The Danish approach is novel because it creates a [[w:Right to property|w:property right]] in one’s biometric identity, treating voice/appearance like [[w:intellectual property]], whereas the previous legislative steps elsewhere have been harms-based. | ||
