Laws against synthesis and other related crimes: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 248: / Line 248: @@
 The legislative proposal comes from the Department of Culture of Denmark and is said to have massive support among MPs.<ref name="guardian-denmark-antifake-legislation-2025"/> The planned changes to Danish copyright law will, once approved, theoretically give people in Denmark the right to demand that online platforms remove content that is in violation of a Danish human's copyright.<ref name="guardian-denmark-antifake-legislation-2025"/> Parodies and satire get an exception and would still be permitted.<ref name="guardian-denmark-antifake-legislation-2025"/>
+{{Q|“I am extremely proud that we are now sending an unequivocal signal to all citizens that they have the right to their own body, their own voice, and their own facial features.
+In a time when technology has outpaced legislation, I am pleased that so many parties in Parliament are joining to protect artists and everyday people from the digital identity theft that can now be done with just a few clicks.
+We must not accept that human beings can simply go through the digital copy machine and be misused for all sorts of purposes.
+Technology is developing rapidly, and in the future it will be even harder to distinguish reality from fiction in the digital world.
+Therefore, it is high time that we build a safeguard against the spread of misinformation while also sending a clear signal to the tech giants.”|Jakob Engel-Schmidt, Culture Minister of Denmark (translated)<ref>https://kum.dk/aktuelt/nyheder/bred-aftale-om-deepfakes-giver-alle-ret-til-egen-krop-og-egen-stemme translation by ChatGPT</ref>|the Danish law initiative to give humans copyright to their own voice and appearance}}
 '''Official'''