3,853
edits
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (→Law on synthetic filth in California: + ...in the civil code of the w:California Codes (AB-602)) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (complete rewrite of the law proposal to ban the visual synthetic filth, but not the raw materials to make it, which happen to be the same that the Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept) would need in order to be able to operate + rename heading(s) to === Law proposal to ban visual synthetic filth ===) |
||
Line 382: | Line 382: | ||
the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''. | the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''. | ||
=== Law proposal to ban | === Law proposal to ban visual synthetic filth === | ||
==== §1 Models of human appearance ==== | |||
A '''model of human appearance''' means | |||
::* A realistic '''3D model''' | |||
::* A '''[[Glossary#Bidirectional reflectance distribution function|7D bidirectional reflectance distribution function]] model''' | |||
::* A '''direct-to-2D''' capable [[w:machine learning]] model | |||
::* Or a model made with any technology whatsoever, that looks deceivingly like the target person. | |||
''' | ==== §2 Producing and distributing synthetic pornography ==== | ||
Making '''projections''', still or videographic, where targets are portrayed in a '''nude''' or in a '''sexual situation''' and also '''distributing''' media from models of human appearance defined in §1 '''without express consent''' is '''illegal'''. Also '''making available''', '''public display''', '''purchase''', '''sale''', '''yielding''', '''import''' and '''export''' of non-authorized '''synthetic pornography''' are '''punishable'''. | |||
==== §3 Aggravated producing and distributing synthetic pornography ==== | |||
If the media described in §2 is made or distributed with the '''intent''' to '''frame for a crime''' or for '''blackmail''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''. | |||
=== | === Afterwords === | ||
The original idea I had was to ban both the raw materials i.e. the models to make the visual synthetic filth and also the end product, but then in July 2019 it appeared to me that [[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]] could really help in this age of industrial disinformation if it were built and trained and banning modeling of human appearance was in conflict with the "original plan". | |||
One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet. | |||
In case we want to pursue banning modeling people's appearance from non-pornographic images/videos without explicit permission be pursued it must be <font color="green">formulated</font> so that this <font color="red">'''does not make'''</font> <big>'''[[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]]'''</big> <font color="red">illegal</font> / <font color="red">impossible</font>. This would seem to lead to a weird situation where modeling a human from non-pornographic media would be illegal, but modeling from pornography legal. | |||
---- | |||
= 1st seen in = | = 1st seen in = | ||
<references group="1st seen in" /> | <references group="1st seen in" /> |