Biblical connection - Revelation 13 and Daniel 7: Difference between revisions

Biblical connection - Revelation 13 and Daniel 7 (edit)

Revision as of 19:53, 1 June 2020

1,500 bytes removed , 3 years ago

→‎Book of Revelations: combined verses 1 and 2 with minor reorg

Juho Kunsola

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

3,839

edits

@@ Line 641: / Line 641: @@
 === Revelation 13 ===
-==== Revelation 13:1 ====
+==== Revelation 13:1-2 ====
-===== Revelation 13:1 - The 1st beast (naked female-looking digital look-alike) rises from the sea =====
+===== Revelation 13:1-2 - The 1st beast rises from the sea =====
-{|
-|+ '''Revelation 13:1'''
+{| border=1
+|+ '''Revelation 13:1-2 '''
+|-
 !GNBUK
 !KJV
@@ Line 650: / Line 652: @@
 !KR38
 |-
-|
+|{{Revelation/13/1/GNBUK}}
-Then I saw a beast coming up out of the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads; on each of its horns there was a crown, and on each of its heads there was a name that was insulting to God.
+{{Revelation/13/2/GNBUK}}
-||
+|{{Revelation/13/1/KJV}}
-And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
+{{Revelation/13/2/KJV}}
-||
-Minä näin, kuinka merestä nousi peto. Sillä oli kymmenen sarvea ja seitsemän päätä, ja kaikissa kymmenessä sarvessa oli kruunu ja jokaiseen päähän oli kirjoitettu herjaava nimi.
-||
+|{{Revelation/13/1/KR92}}
-Ja minä näin pedon nousevan merestä; sillä oli kymmenen sarvea ja seitsemän päätä, ja sarvissansa kymmenen kruunua, ja sen päihin oli kirjoitettu pilkkaavia nimiä.
+{{Revelation/13/2/KR92}}
-||
+|{{Revelation/13/1/KR38}}
+{{Revelation/13/2/KR38}}
 |-
-! Attempts of explanation
+!Attempts of explanation and teaching
-|-
-|
-Knowing the fascination for pornography among men, it can be assumed that the first ever '''[[digital look-alikes|digital look-alike]]''' made, which passed human testing i.e. people thought it was an image of a human imaged with a camera, had the appearance of a woman. In reality a digital look-alike absolutely is not a human and it is not imaged with a camera, but a simulation of a camera.
-The blasphemous names written in the heads probably refer to that people call the beast by many names, because they have not yet realized, that we should not use the names of the beast, but we should develop a '''term''' for it so that we can talk about them and to discuss how we can oppose the terror inflicted by the beasts and to help the humankind to come through this tedious situation into which we have been sinking since the early 00's. This term is '''digital look-alike'''. It is not just an another name more for the beasts for it is a term that answers two questions: "What?" Answer: "look-alike"  and "What kind?" Answer: "digital".
-|}
-==== Revelation 13:2 ====
-===== Revelation 13:2 - The beast is given authority by the dragon =====
-{|
-|+ '''Revelation 13:2'''
-!GNBUK
-!KJV
-!KR92
-!KR38
 |-
-|
+|A 7D model that is projected into 2D can be freely made to whatever shape and appearance. Hollywood films have been full of projected "monsters" for a longer time than '''[[digital look-alikes]]''' have existed. The reason for this is that our brains are very adept at noticing if something that pretends to look like an image of a human contains even the slightest errors, which leads to that the product does not pass human testing, whereas for the "monsters" we know intuitively, that it under no circumstances is genuine.
-The beast looked like a leopard, with feet like a bear's feet and a mouth like a lion's mouth. The dragon gave the beast his own power, his throne, and his vast authority.
+The blasphemous names written in the heads probably refer to that people call the beast by many names, because they have not yet realized, that we should not use the names of the beast, but we should develop a '''term''' for it so that we can talk about them and to discuss how we can oppose the terror inflicted by the beasts and to help the humankind to come through this tedious situation into which we have been sinking since the early 00's. This term is digital look-alike. It is not just an another name more for the beasts for it is a term that answers two questions: "What?" Answer: "look-alike"  and "What kind?" Answer: "digital".
-||
+Knowing the fascination for pornography among men, it can be assumed that the first ever naked digital look-alike made, which passed human testing i.e. people thought it was an image of a human imaged with a camera, had the appearance of a woman. In reality a digital look-alike absolutely is not a human and it is not imaged with a camera, but a simulation of a camera.
-And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
-||
-Peto, jonka näin, muistutti leopardia, mutta sillä oli jalat kuin karhulla ja sen kita oli kuin leijonan kita. Lohikäärme antoi sille voimansa ja valtaistuimensa ja suuren vallan.
-||
-Ja peto, jonka minä näin, oli leopardin näköinen, ja sen jalat ikäänkuin karhun, ja sen kita niinkuin leijonan kita. Ja lohikäärme antoi sille voimansa ja valtaistuimensa ja suuren vallan.
+If Jesus would have given for John to see a vision, where a naked woman arises from the sea, John would probably just have closed his eyes or turned his head away in order to avoid contaminating his consciousness and could not have understood that beast to be a digital look-alike that tries to fake looking like a woman. To explain the concept and implementation of computer animation to person living almost 2,000 years ago would have been very challenging, if not impossible, and anyways this was not what Jesus gave for John to foresee.
 |-
-! Attempts of explanation
+!Contexting
+!Notes about translations
+!Further reading
 |-
 |
-A 7D model that is projected into 2D can be freely made to whatever shape and appearance. Hollywood films have been full of projected "monsters" for a longer time than digital look-alikes have existed. The reason for this is that our brains are very adept at noticing if something that pretends to look like an image of a human contains even the slightest errors, which leads to that the product does not pass human testing, whereas for the "monsters" we know intuitively, that it under no circumstances is genuine.
+|
+|
-If Jesus would have given for John to see a vision, where a naked woman arises from the sea, John would probably just have closed his eyes or turned his head away in order to avoid contaminating his consciousness and could not have understood that beast to be a digital look-alike that tries to fake looking like a woman. To explain the concept and implementation of computer animation to person living almost 2,000 years ago would have been very challenging, if not impossible, and anyways this was not what Jesus gave for John to foresee.
-|-
 |}