3,839
edits
Biblical connection - Revelation 13 and Daniel 7: Difference between revisions
Biblical connection - Revelation 13 and Daniel 7 (edit)
Revision as of 13:05, 21 November 2020
, 3 years ago→Revelation 13:18 - Calculate the number of the beast: + adding a quote from the Bible + stating which translation the snippets are from
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (→Bible sources: tweak headings) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (→Revelation 13:18 - Calculate the number of the beast: + adding a quote from the Bible + stating which translation the snippets are from) |
||
| Line 1,179: | Line 1,179: | ||
| | | | ||
====== Revelation 13:18 - explanation - The beasts are a result of calculation ====== | ====== Revelation 13:18 - explanation - The beasts are a result of calculation ====== | ||
::''"count the number of the beast"'' | ::''"count the number of the beast"'' (KJV) | ||
The beast itself is a result of calculation: The beasts would not be possible if the principles of automated calculation and automata (computers and programs) based on those principles would not have been invented and developed for tens of years. Manufacturing the beasts is calculation and the method to unleash them upon human eyes is also calculation, which is the primary route by which they infect the consciousnesses of humans, is also calculation. | The beast itself is a result of calculation: The beasts would not be possible if the principles of automated calculation and automata (computers and programs) based on those principles would not have been invented and developed for tens of years. Manufacturing the beasts is calculation and the method to unleash them upon human eyes is also calculation, which is the primary route by which they infect the consciousnesses of humans, is also calculation. | ||
====== Revelation 13:18 - explanation - The 666th victim of naked appearance theft ====== | ====== Revelation 13:18 - explanation - The 666th victim of naked appearance theft ====== | ||
::''"for it is the number of a man"'' | ::''"for it is the number of a man"'' (KJV) | ||
It indeed was! The 666th person, whose naked appearance was stolen into a 7-dimensional bidirectional reflectance distribution function model, locked far away from the reach of that person and forging of synthetic terror porn by working on the animation until it passed human tests with flying colors was a little while ago and Heaven only knows who was that 666th with such wretched luck. The person in question is likely still alive, as the last missing piece of the puzzle to make immobile beasts i.e. the reflectance capture over the human face was done for the first time as far as we know in 1999 by a team at the University of Southern California, led by Paul Debevec and the results were published in SIGGRAPH 2000, where the créme de la créme of computer graphics convenes once a year. | It indeed was! The 666th person, whose naked appearance was stolen into a 7-dimensional bidirectional reflectance distribution function model, locked far away from the reach of that person and forging of synthetic terror porn by working on the animation until it passed human tests with flying colors was a little while ago and Heaven only knows who was that 666th with such wretched luck. The person in question is likely still alive, as the last missing piece of the puzzle to make immobile beasts i.e. the reflectance capture over the human face was done for the first time as far as we know in 1999 by a team at the University of Southern California, led by Paul Debevec and the results were published in SIGGRAPH 2000, where the créme de la créme of computer graphics convenes once a year. | ||
====== Revelation 13:18 - explanation - 64-bit computing and 256-bit addressing ====== | ====== Revelation 13:18 - explanation - 64-bit computing and 256-bit addressing ====== | ||
::''"Its number is 666."'' (GNBUK) | |||
Making moving [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital look-alikes|digital look-alikes]] to pass human testing would probably have been technically very difficult, if not impossible, without 64-bit computing, as 32-bit architecture has a maximum of mere 4,3 billion possible addresses, though it is possible to escape to larger address spaces in order to calculate bigger numbers. | Making moving [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital look-alikes|digital look-alikes]] to pass human testing would probably have been technically very difficult, if not impossible, without 64-bit computing, as 32-bit architecture has a maximum of mere 4,3 billion possible addresses, though it is possible to escape to larger address spaces in order to calculate bigger numbers. | ||
| Line 1,200: | Line 1,201: | ||
The last '''6''' digits of these two numbers are '''551616''' and '''639936'''. You'll notice that both contain 2 pcs of number '''6'''. | The last '''6''' digits of these two numbers are '''551616''' and '''639936'''. You'll notice that both contain 2 pcs of number '''6'''. | ||
In the last 6 characters of 2⁶⁴ if you '''sum''' | In the last 6 characters of 2⁶⁴ if you '''sum up''' the two '''1''''s and the two '''5''''s you end up with just '''sixes''' | ||
In the last 6 characters of 2²⁵⁶ if you '''subtract''' the two '''3''''s from the two '''9''''s you also end up with just '''sixes'''. | In the last 6 characters of 2²⁵⁶ if you '''subtract''' the two '''3''''s from the two '''9''''s you also end up with just '''sixes'''. | ||