Laws against synthesis and other related crimes: Difference between revisions

mv content around unchanged
(complete rewrite of the law proposal to ban the visual synthetic filth, but not the raw materials to make it, which happen to be the same that the Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept) would need in order to be able to operate + rename heading(s) to === Law proposal to ban visual synthetic filth ===)
(mv content around unchanged)
Line 240: Line 240:
{{#lst:Mediatheque|HelenMort2020}}
{{#lst:Mediatheque|HelenMort2020}}


----
= Law proposals =
== Law proposals against synthetic filth by [[User:Juho Kunsola|Juho Kunsola]] ==
* '''Audience''': Developed with suitability for national, supranational and UN treaty levels.
* '''Writing context''':
** Written from context of inclusion to '''criminal codes'''.
** I'm a Finn so this has been worded to fit in the [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1889/18890039001#L24 Chapter 24 of the Criminal Code of Finland (in Finnish at finlex.fi)] titled "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"
** [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039 Access the English translations of the Finnish Criminal Code at finlex.fi] or [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039_20150766.pdf go straight to the latest .pdf from 2016]. Chapter 24 starts on page 107.
* '''History''': This version is an evolution of a Finnish language original written in 2016.
Existing law in <big>Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"</big> seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]].
The portions affected by or affecting the synthetic filth situation in bold font:
* Section 1 - Invasion of domestic premises (879/2013)
* Section 1(a) - '''Harassing communications''' (879/2013)
* Section 2 - Aggravated invasion of domestic premises (531/2000)
* Section 3 - Invasion of public premises (585/2005)
* Section 4 - Aggravated invasion of public premises (531/2000)
* Section 5 - '''Eavesdropping''' (531/2000)
* Section 6 - '''Illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 7 - '''Preparation of eavesdropping or illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 8 - '''Dissemination of information violating personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 8(a) - '''Aggravated  dissemination  of  information violating  personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 9 - '''Defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 10 - '''Aggravated defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 11 - Definition (531/2000)
* Section 12 - '''Right to bring charges''' (879/2013)
* Section 13 - '''Corporate criminal liability''' (511/2011)
[[File:The-diffuse-reflection-deducted-from-the-specular-reflection-Debevec-2000.png|thumb|right|260px|Subtraction of the diffuse reflection from the specular reflection. Image is scaled for luminocity. Diffuse reflection is acquired by placing polarizers in 90 degree angle and specular with 0 degree angle.
<br /><br />
[[:File:Deb-2000-reflectance-separation.png|Original picture]]  by [[w:Paul Debevec|Debevec]] et al. - Copyright ACM 2000 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=311779.344855]]
=== Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human voice ===
==== §1 Covert modeling of a human voice ====
'''Acquiring''' such a '''model of a human's voice''', that '''deceptively resembles''' some '''dead''' or '''living''' person's voice model of human voice, possession, purchase, sale, yielding, import and export '''without the express consent of the target''' is '''punishable'''.
==== §2 Application of covert voice models ====
'''Producing''' and '''making available''' media from a covert voice model is '''punishable'''.
==== §3 Aggravated application of covert voice models ====
If produced media is for a '''purpose''' to
::* '''frame''' a '''human''' target or targets for '''crimes'''
::* to attempt '''extortion''' or
::* to '''defame the target''',
the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.
=== Law proposal to ban visual synthetic filth ===
==== §1 Models of human appearance ====
A '''model of human appearance''' means
::* A realistic '''3D model'''
::* A '''[[Glossary#Bidirectional reflectance distribution function|7D bidirectional reflectance distribution function]]  model'''
::* A '''direct-to-2D''' capable [[w:machine learning]] model
::* Or a model made with any technology whatsoever, that looks deceivingly like the target person.
==== §2 Producing and distributing synthetic pornography ====
Making '''projections''', still or videographic, where targets are portrayed in a '''nude''' or in a '''sexual situation''' and also '''distributing''' media from models of human appearance defined in §1 '''without express consent''' is '''illegal'''. Also '''making available''', '''public display''', '''purchase''', '''sale''', '''yielding''', '''import''' and '''export''' of non-authorized '''synthetic pornography''' are '''punishable'''.
==== §3 Aggravated producing and distributing synthetic pornography ====
If the media described in §2 is made or distributed with the '''intent''' to '''frame for a crime''' or for '''blackmail''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.
=== Afterwords ===
The original idea I had was to ban both the raw materials i.e. the models to make the visual synthetic filth and also the end product, but then in July 2019 it appeared to me that [[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]] could really help in this age of industrial disinformation if it were built and trained and banning modeling of human appearance was in conflict with the "original plan".
One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet.
In case we want to pursue banning modeling people's appearance from non-pornographic images/videos without explicit permission be pursued it must be <font color="green">formulated</font> so that this <font color="red">'''does not make'''</font> <big>'''[[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]]'''</big> <font color="red">illegal</font> / <font color="red">impossible</font>. This would seem to lead to a weird situation where modeling a human from non-pornographic media would be illegal, but modeling from pornography legal.
----
= Resources and reporting on law =
= Resources and reporting on law =
== AI and law in general ==
== AI and law in general ==
Line 332: Line 408:
{{#lst:Quotes|FinalLineOfDefenseForTheTimeBeing}}
{{#lst:Quotes|FinalLineOfDefenseForTheTimeBeing}}


= Law proposals =
== Law proposals to ban covert modeling by [[User:Juho Kunsola|Juho Kunsola]] ==
* '''Audience''': Developed with suitability for national, supranational and UN treaty levels.
* '''Writing context''':
** Written from context of inclusion to '''criminal codes'''.
** I'm a Finn so this has been worded to fit in the [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1889/18890039001#L24 Chapter 24 of the Criminal Code of Finland (in Finnish at finlex.fi)] titled "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"
** [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039 Access the English translations of the Finnish Criminal Code at finlex.fi] or [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039_20150766.pdf go straight to the latest .pdf from 2016]. Chapter 24 starts on page 107.
* '''History''': This version is an evolution of a Finnish language original written in 2016.
Existing law in <big>Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"</big> seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]].
The portions affected by or affecting the synthetic filth situation in bold font:
* Section 1 - Invasion of domestic premises (879/2013)
* Section 1(a) - '''Harassing communications''' (879/2013)
* Section 2 - Aggravated invasion of domestic premises (531/2000)
* Section 3 - Invasion of public premises (585/2005)
* Section 4 - Aggravated invasion of public premises (531/2000)
* Section 5 - '''Eavesdropping''' (531/2000)
* Section 6 - '''Illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 7 - '''Preparation of eavesdropping or illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 8 - '''Dissemination of information violating personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 8(a) - '''Aggravated  dissemination  of  information violating  personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 9 - '''Defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 10 - '''Aggravated defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 11 - Definition (531/2000)
* Section 12 - '''Right to bring charges''' (879/2013)
* Section 13 - '''Corporate criminal liability''' (511/2011)
[[File:The-diffuse-reflection-deducted-from-the-specular-reflection-Debevec-2000.png|thumb|right|260px|Subtraction of the diffuse reflection from the specular reflection. Image is scaled for luminocity. Diffuse reflection is acquired by placing polarizers in 90 degree angle and specular with 0 degree angle.
<br /><br />
[[:File:Deb-2000-reflectance-separation.png|Original picture]]  by [[w:Paul Debevec|Debevec]] et al. - Copyright ACM 2000 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=311779.344855]]
=== Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human voice ===
==== §1 Covert modeling of a human voice ====
'''Acquiring''' such a '''model of a human's voice''', that '''deceptively resembles''' some '''dead''' or '''living''' person's voice model of human voice, possession, purchase, sale, yielding, import and export '''without the express consent of the target''' is '''punishable'''.
==== §2 Application of covert voice models ====
'''Producing''' and '''making available''' media from a covert voice model is '''punishable'''.
==== §3 Aggravated application of covert voice models ====
If produced media is for a '''purpose''' to
::* '''frame''' a '''human''' target or targets for '''crimes'''
::* to attempt '''extortion''' or
::* to '''defame the target''',
the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.
=== Law proposal to ban visual synthetic filth ===
==== §1 Models of human appearance ====
A '''model of human appearance''' means
::* A realistic '''3D model'''
::* A '''[[Glossary#Bidirectional reflectance distribution function|7D bidirectional reflectance distribution function]]  model'''
::* A '''direct-to-2D''' capable [[w:machine learning]] model
::* Or a model made with any technology whatsoever, that looks deceivingly like the target person.
==== §2 Producing and distributing synthetic pornography ====
Making '''projections''', still or videographic, where targets are portrayed in a '''nude''' or in a '''sexual situation''' and also '''distributing''' media from models of human appearance defined in §1 '''without express consent''' is '''illegal'''. Also '''making available''', '''public display''', '''purchase''', '''sale''', '''yielding''', '''import''' and '''export''' of non-authorized '''synthetic pornography''' are '''punishable'''.
==== §3 Aggravated producing and distributing synthetic pornography ====
If the media described in §2 is made or distributed with the '''intent''' to '''frame for a crime''' or for '''blackmail''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.
=== Afterwords ===
The original idea I had was to ban both the raw materials i.e. the models to make the visual synthetic filth and also the end product, but then in July 2019 it appeared to me that [[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]] could really help in this age of industrial disinformation if it were built and trained and banning modeling of human appearance was in conflict with the "original plan".
One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet.
In case we want to pursue banning modeling people's appearance from non-pornographic images/videos without explicit permission be pursued it must be <font color="green">formulated</font> so that this <font color="red">'''does not make'''</font> <big>'''[[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]]'''</big> <font color="red">illegal</font> / <font color="red">impossible</font>. This would seem to lead to a weird situation where modeling a human from non-pornographic media would be illegal, but modeling from pornography legal.


----
----