3,839
edits
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (mv content around unchanged) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (→Law proposal to ban visual synthetic filth: splitting to ==== §2 Producing synthetic pornography ==== and ==== §3 Distributing synthetic pornography ====) |
||
Line 287: | Line 287: | ||
::* Or a model made with any technology whatsoever, that looks deceivingly like the target person. | ::* Or a model made with any technology whatsoever, that looks deceivingly like the target person. | ||
==== §2 Producing | ==== §2 Producing synthetic pornography ==== | ||
Making '''projections''', still or videographic, where targets are portrayed in a '''nude''' or in a '''sexual situation''' | Making '''projections''', still or videographic, where targets are portrayed in a '''nude''' or in a '''sexual situation''' from models of human appearance defined in §1 '''without express consent''' of the targets is '''illegal'''. | ||
==== §3 Aggravated producing and distributing synthetic pornography ==== | ==== §3 Distributing synthetic pornography ==== | ||
If the media described in §2 is made or distributed with the '''intent''' to '''frame for a crime''' or for '''blackmail''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''. | '''Distributing''', '''making available''', '''public display''', '''purchase''', '''sale''', '''yielding''', '''import''' and '''export''' of non-authorized '''synthetic pornography''' defined in §2 are '''punishable'''.<ref group="footnotes">People who are found in possession of this synthetic pornography should probably not be penalized, but rather advised to get some help.</ref> | ||
==== §4 Aggravated producing and distributing synthetic pornography ==== | |||
If the media described in §2 or §3 is made or distributed with the '''intent''' to '''frame for a crime''' or for '''blackmail''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''. | |||
==== Afterwords ==== | ==== Afterwords ==== | ||
Line 298: | Line 301: | ||
One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet. | One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet. | ||
In case we want to pursue banning modeling people's appearance from non-pornographic images/videos without explicit permission be pursued it must be <font color="green">formulated</font> so that this <font color="red">'''does not make'''</font> <big>'''[[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]]'''</big> <font color="red">illegal</font> / <font color="red">impossible</font>. This would seem to lead to a weird situation where modeling a human from non-pornographic media would be illegal, but modeling from pornography legal. | In case we want to pursue banning modeling people's appearance from non-pornographic images/videos without explicit permission be pursued it must be <font color="green">formulated</font> so that this <font color="red">'''does not make'''</font> <big>'''[[Adequate Porn Watcher AI (concept)]]'''</big> <font color="red">illegal</font> / <font color="red">impossible</font>. This would seem to lead to a weird situation where modeling a human from non-pornographic media would be illegal, but modeling from pornography legal. | ||
=== Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human voice === | === Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human voice === |