Laws against synthesis and other related crimes: Difference between revisions

From Stop Synthetic Filth! wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Existing law in Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''" seems to be ineffective against many synthetic human-like fake attack and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with digital sound-alikes. + ripped the English translations of the sections of Chapter 24 for discovery of what works, what doesn't and what could be harmful.)
(+ The portions affected by or affecting the synthetic filth situation in bold font in the list of sections of Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation")
Line 7: Line 7:




Existing law in Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''" seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]].
Existing law in <big>Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"</big> seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]].
 
The portions affected by or affecting the synthetic filth situation in bold font:


* Section 1 - Invasion of domestic premises (879/2013)
* Section 1 - Invasion of domestic premises (879/2013)
* Section 1(a) - Harassing communications (879/2013)
* Section 1(a) - '''Harassing communications''' (879/2013)
* Section 2 - Aggravated invasion of domestic premises (531/2000)
* Section 2 - Aggravated invasion of domestic premises (531/2000)
* Section 3 - Invasion of public premises (585/2005)
* Section 3 - Invasion of public premises (585/2005)
* Section 4 - Aggravated invasion of public premises (531/2000)
* Section 4 - Aggravated invasion of public premises (531/2000)
* Section 5 - Eavesdropping (531/2000)
* Section 5 - '''Eavesdropping''' (531/2000)
* Section 6 - Illicit observation (531/2000)
* Section 6 - '''Illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 7 - Preparation of eavesdropping or illicit observation (531/2000)
* Section 7 - '''Preparation of eavesdropping or illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 8 - Dissemination of information violating personal privacy (879/2013)
* Section 8 - '''Dissemination of information violating personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 8(a) - Aggravated  dissemination  of  information violating  personal privacy (879/2013)
* Section 8(a) - '''Aggravated  dissemination  of  information violating  personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 9 - Defamation (879/2013)
* Section 9 - '''Defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 10 - Aggravated defamation (879/2013)
* Section 10 - '''Aggravated defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 11 - Definition (531/2000)
* Section 11 - Definition (531/2000)
* Section 12 - Right to bring charges (879/2013)
* Section 12 - '''Right to bring charges''' (879/2013)
* Section 13 - Corporate criminal liability (511/2011)
* Section 13 - '''Corporate criminal liability''' (511/2011)


== Law proposals to ban covert modeling by [[User:Juho Kunsola|Juho Kunsola]] ==
== Law proposals to ban covert modeling by [[User:Juho Kunsola|Juho Kunsola]] ==

Revision as of 21:40, 2 November 2020


Existing law in Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation" seems to be ineffective against many synthetic human-like fake attack and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with digital sound-alikes.

The portions affected by or affecting the synthetic filth situation in bold font:

  • Section 1 - Invasion of domestic premises (879/2013)
  • Section 1(a) - Harassing communications (879/2013)
  • Section 2 - Aggravated invasion of domestic premises (531/2000)
  • Section 3 - Invasion of public premises (585/2005)
  • Section 4 - Aggravated invasion of public premises (531/2000)
  • Section 5 - Eavesdropping (531/2000)
  • Section 6 - Illicit observation (531/2000)
  • Section 7 - Preparation of eavesdropping or illicit observation (531/2000)
  • Section 8 - Dissemination of information violating personal privacy (879/2013)
  • Section 8(a) - Aggravated dissemination of information violating personal privacy (879/2013)
  • Section 9 - Defamation (879/2013)
  • Section 10 - Aggravated defamation (879/2013)
  • Section 11 - Definition (531/2000)
  • Section 12 - Right to bring charges (879/2013)
  • Section 13 - Corporate criminal liability (511/2011)

Law proposals to ban covert modeling by Juho Kunsola

Subtraction of the diffuse reflection from the specular reflection. Image is scaled for luminocity. Diffuse reflection is acquired by placing polarizers in 90 degree angle and specular with 0 degree angle.

Original picture by Debevec et al. - Copyright ACM 2000 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=311779.344855

Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human voice

§1 Covert modeling of a human voice

Acquiring such a model of a human's voice, that deceptively resembles some dead or living person's voice model of human voice, possession, purchase, sale, yielding, import and export without the express consent of the target is punishable.

§2 Application of covert voice models

Producing and making available media from a covert voice model is punishable.

§3 Aggravated application of covert voice models

If produced media is for a purpose to

  • frame a human target or targets for crimes
  • to attempt extortion or
  • to defame the target,

the crime should be judged as aggravated.

Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human appearance

Obs. Should banning modeling people's appearance without explicit permission be pursued it must be formulated so that this does not make Adequate Porn Watcher AI illegal / impossible.

One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet.

§1 Covert modeling of human appearance

Covertly acquiring

without without consent covert modeling of appearance is illegal. Also possession, purchase, sale, yielding, import and export of covert models are punishable.

§2 Aggravated covert modeling of human appearance

If a covert model of the head or the face is attached to a look-alike of a naked body, regardless of whether that is synthetic or of human, the crime should be judged as aggravated.

§3 Application of covert appearance models

Projection and making available media from covert models defined in §1 is punishable.

§4 Aggravated application of covert appearance models

If the projection is portrayed in a nude or sexual situation or used with the intent to frame for a crime or for blackmail, the crime should be judged as aggravated.