3,839
edits
Laws against synthesis and other related crimes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Laws against synthesis and other related crimes (edit)
Revision as of 19:26, 9 September 2021
, 2 years ago+ File:Flag of Europe.svg
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (→Law on synthetic filth in California 2020: turns out the Senate bill is stuck, meanwhile the Assembly bill became law + sourcing it from <ref name="CaliforniaStateLaw AB 602">) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| quote = }} | | quote = }} | ||
</ref>, as [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-386.2/ § 18.2-386.2 titled ''''''Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; penalty.''''''] became part of the '''[[w:Code of Virginia]]'''. | </ref>, as section [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-386.2/ § 18.2-386.2 titled ''''''Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; penalty.''''''] became part of the '''[[w:Code of Virginia]]'''. | ||
[https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/ '''Code of Virginia''' (TOC)] » [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/ '''Title 18.2.''' Crimes and Offenses Generally] » [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter8/ '''Chapter 8.''' Crimes Involving Morals and Decency] » [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacodefull/title18.2/chapter8/article5/ '''Article 5.''' Obscenity and Related Offenses] » '''Section''' [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-386.2/ § '''18.2-386.2.''' Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; penalty] | |||
The [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-386.2/ | The [https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-386.2/ section '''§ 18.2-386.2. Unlawful dissemination or sale of images of another; penalty.''' of Virginia] is as follows: | ||
A. ''Any [[w:person]] who, with the [[w:Intention (criminal law)|w:intent]] to [[w:coercion|w:coerce]], [[w:harassment|w:harass]], or [[w:intimidation|w:intimidate]], [[w:Malice_(law)|w:malicious]]ly [[w:dissemination|w:disseminates]] or [[w:sales|w:sells]] any videographic or still image created by any means whatsoever that [[w:Depiction|w:depicts]] another person who is totally [[w:nudity|w:nude]], or in a state of undress so as to expose the [[w:sex organs|w:genitals]], pubic area, [[w:buttocks]], or female [[w:breast]], where such person knows or has reason to know that he is not [[w:license]]d or [[w:authorization|w:authorized]] to disseminate or sell such [[w:Video|w:videographic]] or [[w:Film still|w:still image]] is [[w:Guilt (law)|w:guilty]] of a Class 1 [[w:Misdemeanor#United States|w:misdemeanor]]. | '''A'''. ''Any [[w:person]] who, with the [[w:Intention (criminal law)|w:intent]] to [[w:coercion|w:coerce]], [[w:harassment|w:harass]], or [[w:intimidation|w:intimidate]], [[w:Malice_(law)|w:malicious]]ly [[w:dissemination|w:disseminates]] or [[w:sales|w:sells]] any videographic or still image created by any means whatsoever that [[w:Depiction|w:depicts]] another person who is totally [[w:nudity|w:nude]], or in a state of undress so as to expose the [[w:sex organs|w:genitals]], pubic area, [[w:buttocks]], or female [[w:breast]], where such person knows or has reason to know that he is not [[w:license]]d or [[w:authorization|w:authorized]] to disseminate or sell such [[w:Video|w:videographic]] or [[w:Film still|w:still image]] is [[w:Guilt (law)|w:guilty]] of a Class 1 [[w:Misdemeanor#United States|w:misdemeanor]]. | ||
::For purposes of this subsection, "another person" includes a person whose image was used in creating, adapting, or modifying a videographic or still image with the intent to depict an actual person and who is recognizable as an actual person by the person's [[w:face]], [[w:Simulacrum|w:likeness]], or other distinguishing characteristic.'' | ::For purposes of this subsection, "another person" includes a person whose image was used in creating, adapting, or modifying a videographic or still image with the intent to depict an actual person and who is recognizable as an actual person by the person's [[w:face]], [[w:Simulacrum|w:likeness]], or other distinguishing characteristic.'' | ||
B. ''If a person uses [[w:Service (economics)|w:services]] of an [[w:Internet service provider]], an electronic mail service provider, or any other information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server in committing acts prohibited under this section, such provider shall not be held responsible for violating this section for content provided by another person.'' | '''B'''. ''If a person uses [[w:Service (economics)|w:services]] of an [[w:Internet service provider]], an electronic mail service provider, or any other information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server in committing acts prohibited under this section, such provider shall not be held responsible for violating this section for content provided by another person.'' | ||
C. ''Venue for a prosecution under this section may lie in the [[w:jurisdiction]] where the unlawful act occurs or where any videographic or still image created by any means whatsoever is produced, reproduced, found, stored, received, or possessed in violation of this section.'' | '''C.''' ''Venue for a prosecution under this section may lie in the [[w:jurisdiction]] where the unlawful act occurs or where any videographic or still image created by any means whatsoever is produced, reproduced, found, stored, received, or possessed in violation of this section.'' | ||
D. ''The provisions of this section shall not preclude prosecution under any other [[w:statute]].''<ref name="Virginia2019Chapter515"/> | '''D.''' ''The provisions of this section shall not preclude prosecution under any other [[w:statute]].''<ref name="Virginia2019Chapter515"/> | ||
The identical bills were [https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?191+sum+HB2678 House Bill 2678] presented by [[w:Delegate (American politics)|w:Delegate]] [[w:Marcus Simon]] to the [[w:Virginia House of Delegates]] on January 14 2019 and three day later an identical [https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?191+sum+SB1736 Senate bill 1736] was introduced to the [[w:Senate of Virginia]] by Senator [[w:Adam Ebbin]]. | The identical bills were [https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?191+sum+HB2678 House Bill 2678] presented by [[w:Delegate (American politics)|w:Delegate]] [[w:Marcus Simon]] to the [[w:Virginia House of Delegates]] on January 14 2019 and three day later an identical [https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?191+sum+SB1736 Senate bill 1736] was introduced to the [[w:Senate of Virginia]] by Senator [[w:Adam Ebbin]]. | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
[[File:Flag of Texas.svg|thumb|left|200px|[[w:Texas]], the Lone Star State has protected the political candidates, but not ordinary folk against synthetic filth.]] | [[File:Flag of Texas.svg|thumb|left|200px|[[w:Texas]], the Lone Star State has protected the political candidates, but not ordinary folk against synthetic filth.]] | ||
<section begin=Texas2019 />On September 1 2019 [[w:Texas Senate]] bill [https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/html/SB00751F.htm '''SB 751''' - '''''Relating to the creation of a criminal offense for fabricating a deceptive video with intent to influence the outcome of an election'''''] [[w:amendment]]s to the election code came into effect in the [[w:Law of Texas]], giving [[w:candidates]] in [[w:elections]] a '''30-day protection period | <section begin=Texas2019 />On September 1 2019 [[w:Texas Senate]] bill [https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/html/SB00751F.htm '''SB 751''' - '''''Relating to the creation of a criminal offense for fabricating a deceptive video with intent to influence the outcome of an election'''''] [[w:amendment]]s to the election code came into effect in the [[w:Law of Texas]], giving [[w:candidates]] in [[w:elections]] a '''30-day protection period''' to the elections during which making and distributing digital look-alikes or synthetic fakes of the candidates is an offense. The law text defines the subject of the law as "''a video, created with the intent to deceive, that appears to depict a real person performing an action that did not occur in reality''"<ref name="TexasSB751"> | ||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
[[File:Flag of California.svg|thumb|left|200px|[[w:California]] moved later than Virginia, but it outlawed also the manufacture of synthetic filth on Jan 1 2020.]] | [[File:Flag of California.svg|thumb|left|200px|[[w:California]] moved later than Virginia, but it outlawed also the manufacture of synthetic filth on Jan 1 2020.]] | ||
<section begin=California2020 />[[File:Marc Berman.jpg|thumb|120px|right|Homie [[w:Marc Berman|w:Marc Berman]], a righteous fighter for our human rights in this age of industrial disinformation filth and an Assemblymember of the [[w:California State Assembly]], most loved for authoring [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB602 '''AB-602''' - ''Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action''], which came into effect on Jan 1 2020, banning both the manufacturing and [[w:digital distribution]] of synthetic pornography without the [[w:consent]] of the people depicted.]] January 1 2020 <ref name="KFI2019"> | |||
<section begin=California2020 />[[File:Marc Berman.jpg|thumb|120px|right|Homie [[w:Marc Berman|w:Marc Berman]], a righteous fighter for our human rights in this age of industrial disinformation filth and | |||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| Line 97: | Line 94: | ||
|quote=}} | |quote=}} | ||
</ref> the [[w:California]] [[w:State law (United States)|w:US state law]] '''[https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB602 "AB-602 ''Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action''."]''' came into effect in the [[w:California Civil Code|civil code]] of the [[w:California Codes]] banning the manufacturing and [[w:digital distribution]] of synthetic pornography without the [[w:consent]] of the people depicted. AB-602 provides victims of synthetic pornography with [[w:injunction|w:injunctive relief]] and poses legal threats of [[w:statutory damages|w:statutory]] and [[w:punitive damages]] on [[w:criminal]]s making or distributing synthetic pornography without consent. The bill AB-602 was signed into law by California [[w:Governor (United States)|w:Governor]] [[w:Gavin Newsom]] on October 3 2019 and was authored by [[w:California State Assembly]] member [[w:Marc Berman]] and an identical Senate bill was coauthored by [[w:California State Senate|w:California Senator]] [[w:Connie Leyva]].<ref name="OpenStates AB 602"> | </ref> the [[w:California]] [[w:State law (United States)|w:US state law]] '''[https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB602 "AB-602 ''Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action''."]''' came into effect in the [[w:California Civil Code|civil code]] of the [[w:California Codes]] banning the manufacturing and [[w:digital distribution]] of synthetic pornography without the [[w:consent]] of the people depicted. AB-602 provides victims of synthetic pornography with [[w:injunction|w:injunctive relief]] and poses legal threats of [[w:statutory damages|w:statutory]] and [[w:punitive damages]] on [[w:criminal]]s making or distributing synthetic pornography without consent. The bill AB-602 was signed into law by California [[w:Governor (United States)|w:Governor]] [[w:Gavin Newsom]] on October 3 2019 and was authored by [[w:California State Assembly]]member [[w:Marc Berman]] and an identical Senate bill was coauthored by [[w:California State Senate|w:California Senator]] [[w:Connie Leyva]].<ref name="OpenStates AB 602"> | ||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| Line 126: | Line 123: | ||
<section end=California2020 /> | <section end=California2020 /> | ||
[[File:Connie Leyva 2015.jpg|thumb|right|240px|[[w:California]] [[w:California State Senate|w:Senator]] [[w:Connie Leyva]] sponsored [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB564&showamends=false '''California Senate Bill SB 564''' - ''Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action''] in Feb '''2019''' and the Senate Bill was [https://www.sagaftra.org/action-alert-support-california-bill-end-deepfake-porn endorsed by SAG-AFTRA], but the Assembly Bill AB-602 authored by [[w:California State Assembly]]member [[w:Marc Berman]] was the one that became law on 1 January 2020 in the [[w:California Civil Code|w:California Civil Code]] of the [[w:California Codes]].]] | |||
'''Introduction''' by [https://a24.asmdc.org/ Assemblymember Marc Berman]: | |||
''' | '''AB 602''', Berman. '''''Depiction of individual using digital or electronic technology: sexually explicit material: cause of action'''''. | ||
('''a''') '''For purposes of this section''': | Existing law creates a private [[w:Cause of action|w:right of action]] against a person who intentionally distributes a photograph or recorded image of another that exposes the intimate body parts of that person or of a person engaged in a sexual act '''without the person’s consent''' if specified conditions are met. | ||
This bill would provide that a '''depicted individual''', as defined, has a '''[[w:cause of action]] against''' a person who either | |||
* (1) '''creates''' and intentionally discloses sexually explicit material if the person knows or reasonably should have known the '''depicted''' individual '''did not [[w:consent]]''' to its creation or disclosure or | |||
* (2) who '''intentionally discloses''' sexually explicit material that the person did not create if the person knows the '''depicted''' individual '''did not consent''' to its creation. | |||
The bill would specify exceptions to those provisions, including if the material is a matter of legitimate public concern or a work of political or newsworthy value. | |||
The bill would authorize a prevailing [[w:plaintiff]] who suffers harm to seek [[w:Injunction|w:injunctive]] relief and recover reasonable [[w:attorney’s fee]]s and costs as well as specified monetary [[w:damages]], including [[w:Statutory damages|statutory]] and [[w:punitive damages]]. | |||
'''The law is as follows''': | |||
SECTION 1. Section 1708.86 is added to the [https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=CIV&tocTitle=+Civil+Code+-+CIV Civil Code of California], to read: | |||
'''1708.86.''' ('''a''') '''For purposes of this section''': | |||
* (1) “''Altered depiction''” means a performance that was actually performed by the depicted individual but was subsequently altered to be in violation of this section. | * (1) “''Altered depiction''” means a performance that was actually performed by the depicted individual but was subsequently altered to be in violation of this section. | ||
* (2) “''Authorized Representative''” means an attorney, talent agent, or personal manager authorized to represent a depicted individual if the depicted individual is represented. | * (2) “''Authorized Representative''” means an attorney, talent agent, or personal manager authorized to represent a depicted individual if the depicted individual is represented. | ||
| Line 243: | Line 257: | ||
<section end=China2020 /> | <section end=China2020 /> | ||
= Action needed = | |||
== EU Law on AI 20?? == | |||
[[File:Flag of Europe.svg|thumb|left|200px|The EU must address the malicious uses of AI in the law it is planning to regulate AI.]] | |||
The European Union is planning a law on AI | |||
* Read [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206 Proposal for a '''''REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL LAYING DOWN HARMONISED RULES ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACT) AND AMENDING CERTAIN UNION LEGISLATIVE ACTS''''' at eur-lex.europa.eu]<ref group="1st seen in">https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act/ via https://futureoflife.org/ newsletter</ref> (also contains translations) | |||
* https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/ is a website on the planned law by the [https://futureoflife.org/ Future of Life Institute], an American non-profit NGO. | |||
== Law on synthetic filth in the UK 20?? == | |||
[[File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|thumb|left|200px|The UK needs to improve its legislation. Please [https://www.change.org/p/the-law-comission-tighten-regulation-on-taking-making-and-faking-explicit-images sign the petition initiated by Helen Mort] in late 2020.]] | |||
[[File:Helen Mort (2014).jpg|thumb|right|245px|[[w:Helen Mort]] is a British poet, novelist and activist against [[synthetic human-like fakes]]. Please sign the petition [https://www.change.org/p/the-law-comission-tighten-regulation-on-taking-making-and-faking-explicit-images ''''''Tighten regulation on taking, making and faking explicit images'''''' at Change.org] originated by her and to be delivered to the [[w:Law Commission (England and Wales)]] and the prime minister.]] | |||
The UK law does not seem very up-to-date on the issue of synthetic filth. | |||
The independent [[w:Law Commission (England and Wales)]] is currently reviewing the law as it applies to taking, making and sharing intimate images without consent. The outcome of the consultation is due to be published later in 2021.<ref name="BBC2021"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url = https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55546372 | |||
|title = 'Deepfake porn images still give me nightmares' | |||
|last = Royle | |||
|first = Sara | |||
|date = 2021-01-05 | |||
|website = [[w:BBC Online]] | |||
|publisher = [[w:BBC]] | |||
|access-date = 2021-01-31 | |||
|quote = She alerted the police to the images but was told that no action could be taken. Dr Aislinn O'Connell, a lecturer in law at Royal Holloway University of London, explained that Helen's case fell outside the current law.}} | |||
</ref> | |||
"In 2019, law expert Dr Aislinn O’Connell told [[w:The Independent]] that our current laws on image sharing are piecemeal and not fit for purpose. In October 2018 The [[w:Women and Equalities Committee]] called on the UK Government to introduce new legislation on image-based sexual abuse in order to '''criminalise ALL''' non-consensual creation and distribution of intimate sexual images."<ref name="MortPetition2020"> | |||
{{cite web | |||
|url = https://www.change.org/p/the-law-comission-tighten-regulation-on-taking-making-and-faking-explicit-images | |||
|title = Change.org petition: 'Tighten regulation on taking, making and faking explicit images' | |||
|last = Mort | |||
|first = Helen | |||
|date = 2020 | |||
|website = [[w:Change.org]] | |||
|publisher = [[w:Change.org]] | |||
|access-date = 2021-01-31 | |||
|quote = Unlike other forms of revenge porn, creating pictures or videos like this is not yet illegal in the UK, though it is in some places in the US. The police were unable to help me.}} | |||
</ref> This call is for similar laws as California put in place on January 1 2020. | |||
The petition [https://www.change.org/p/the-law-comission-tighten-regulation-on-taking-making-and-faking-explicit-images ''''''Tighten regulation on taking, making and faking explicit images'''''' at Change.org] by [[w:Helen Mort]] aims to petition the UK govt for proper legislation against synthetic filth. See the [[mediatheque]] for a video by Helen Mort on her ordeal of becoming the victim of covert disinformation attacks. | |||
{{#lst:Mediatheque|HelenMort2020}} | |||
= Bills in the works = | = Bills in the works = | ||
== Law on synthetic filth in New York 20?? == | == Law on synthetic filth in New York 20?? == | ||
[[File:Flag of New York (1909–2020).png|thumb|left|200px|[[w:New York State Legislature]] regular session 2021-2022 is contemplating the [https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/S1641 New York senate bill '''S1641'''] and identical [https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/A6517 assembly bill '''A6517'''] to ban sending unsolicited pornography.]] | [[File:Flag of New York (1909–2020).png|thumb|left|200px|[[w:New York State Legislature]] regular session 2021-2022 is contemplating the [https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/S1641 New York senate bill '''S1641'''] and identical [https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/A6517 assembly bill '''A6517'''] to ban sending unsolicited pornography.]] | ||
| Line 297: | Line 364: | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| Line 350: | Line 377: | ||
* '''History''': This version is an evolution of a Finnish language original written in 2016. | * '''History''': This version is an evolution of a Finnish language original written in 2016. | ||
[[File:Suomen lippu valokuva.png|right|thumb|260px|[[w:Finland]] has very logical and very accessible laws, but also here we need updating of the laws for this age of industrial disinformation.]] | [[File:Suomen lippu valokuva.png|right|thumb|260px|[[w:Finland]] has very logical and very [https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/ accessible laws], but also here we need updating of the laws for this age of industrial disinformation.]] | ||
Existing law in <big>Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"</big> seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]]. | Existing law in <big>Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"</big> seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]]. | ||
| Line 404: | Line 431: | ||
=== Law proposal to ban unauthorized modeling of human voice === | === Law proposal to ban unauthorized modeling of human voice === | ||
{{#ev:youtube|0sR1rU3gLzQ|360px|right|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sR1rU3gLzQ Video 'This AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds' by '2 minute papers' at YouTube] describes the voice thieving machine by Google Research in [[w:NeurIPS|w:NeurIPS]] 2018.}} | {{#ev:youtube|0sR1rU3gLzQ|360px|right|[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sR1rU3gLzQ Video 'This AI Clones Your Voice After Listening for 5 Seconds' by '2 minute papers' at YouTube] describes the voice thieving machine by Google Research in [[w:NeurIPS|w:NeurIPS]] 2018.}} | ||
'''Motivation''': The current situation where the criminals can freely trade and grow their libraries of stolen voices is unwise. | |||
==== §1 Unauthorized modeling of a human voice ==== | ==== §1 Unauthorized modeling of a human voice ==== | ||
| Line 451: | Line 480: | ||
== Synthetic filth in the law and media == | == Synthetic filth in the law and media == | ||
* [https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4409&context=vlr ''''''"The New Weapon of Choice": Law's Current Inability to Properly Address Deepfake Pornography'''''' at scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu], October 2020 Notes by Anne Pechenik Gieseke published in the The [[w:Vanderbilt Law Review]], the flagship [[w:academic journal]] of [[w:Vanderbilt University Law School]]. | |||
* [https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/07/08/deepfakes-and-synthetic-media-in-financial-system-assessing-threat-scenarios-pub-82237 ''''''Deepfakes and Synthetic Media in the Financial System: Assessing Threat Scenarios'''''' at carnegieendowment.org], a 2020-07-08 assessment identifies some types of criminalities that can be made using [[synthetic human-like fakes]]. | * [https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/07/08/deepfakes-and-synthetic-media-in-financial-system-assessing-threat-scenarios-pub-82237 ''''''Deepfakes and Synthetic Media in the Financial System: Assessing Threat Scenarios'''''' at carnegieendowment.org], a 2020-07-08 assessment identifies some types of criminalities that can be made using [[synthetic human-like fakes]]. | ||
* [https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol17/iss1/4/ 'Deepfakes: False Pornography Is Here and the Law Cannot Protect You'], published in 2019 in the [[w:Duke Law Journal|Duke Law Journal]], a student-run law review. | * [https://ssri.duke.edu/news/don%E2%80%99t-believe-your-eyes-or-ears-weaponization-artificial-intelligence-machine-learning-and ''''''Don’t Believe Your Eyes (or Ears): The Weaponization of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deepfakes'''''' at ssri.duke.edu], an October 2019 news article by Joe Littell, published by the Social Science Research Institute at the [[w:Duke University]] | ||
* [https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dltr/vol17/iss1/4/ ''''''Deepfakes: False Pornography Is Here and the Law Cannot Protect You'''''' at scholarship.law.duke.edu], published in 2019 in the [[w:Duke Law Journal|Duke Law Journal]], a student-run law review. | |||
== The countries that have unfortunately banned full face veil == | == The countries that have unfortunately banned full face veil == | ||