Editing Laws against synthesis and other related crimes

* '''Audience''': Developed with suitability for national, supranational and UN treaty levels. 
* '''Writing context''': 
** Written from context of inclusion to '''criminal codes'''. 
** I'm a Finn so this has been worded to fit in the [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1889/18890039001#L24 Chapter 24 of the Criminal Code of Finland (in Finnish at finlex.fi)] titled "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''" 
** [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039 Access the English translations of the Finnish Criminal Code at finlex.fi] or [https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/1889/en18890039_20150766.pdf go straight to the latest .pdf from 2016]. Chapter 24 starts on page 107.
* '''History''': This version is an evolution of a Finnish language original written in 2016.


Existing law in <big>Chapter 24. of the Finnish Criminal Code - "''Offences against privacy, public peace and personal reputation''"</big> seems to be ineffective against many [[synthetic human-like fakes|synthetic human-like fake attack]] and seems it could be used to frame victims for crimes with [[synthetic human-like fakes#Digital sound-alikes|digital sound-alikes]].

The portions affected by or affecting the synthetic filth situation in bold font:

* Section 1 - Invasion of domestic premises (879/2013)
* Section 1(a) - '''Harassing communications''' (879/2013)
* Section 2 - Aggravated invasion of domestic premises (531/2000)
* Section 3 - Invasion of public premises (585/2005)
* Section 4 - Aggravated invasion of public premises (531/2000)
* Section 5 - '''Eavesdropping''' (531/2000)
* Section 6 - '''Illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 7 - '''Preparation of eavesdropping or illicit observation''' (531/2000)
* Section 8 - '''Dissemination of information violating personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 8(a) - '''Aggravated  dissemination  of  information violating  personal privacy''' (879/2013)
* Section 9 - '''Defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 10 - '''Aggravated defamation''' (879/2013)
* Section 11 - Definition (531/2000)
* Section 12 - '''Right to bring charges''' (879/2013)
* Section 13 - '''Corporate criminal liability''' (511/2011)

== Law proposals to ban covert modeling by [[User:Juho Kunsola|Juho Kunsola]] ==

[[File:The-diffuse-reflection-deducted-from-the-specular-reflection-Debevec-2000.png|thumb|right|260px|Subtraction of the diffuse reflection from the specular reflection. Image is scaled for luminocity. Diffuse reflection is acquired by placing polarizers in 90 degree angle and specular with 0 degree angle. 
<br /><br />
[[:File:Deb-2000-reflectance-separation.png|Original picture]]  by [[w:Paul Debevec|Debevec]] et al. - Copyright ACM 2000 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=311779.344855]]

=== Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human voice ===

==== §1 Covert modeling of a human voice ====
'''Acquiring''' such a '''model of a human's voice''', that '''deceptively resembles''' some '''dead''' or '''living''' person's voice model of human voice, possession, purchase, sale, yielding, import and export '''without the express consent of the target''' is '''punishable'''.

==== §2 Application of covert voice models ====
'''Producing''' and '''making available''' media from a covert voice model is '''punishable'''. 

==== §3 Aggravated application of covert voice models ====
If produced media is for a '''purpose''' to 
::* '''frame''' a '''human''' target or targets for '''crimes'''
::* to attempt '''extortion''' or 
::* to '''defame the target''', 
the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.

=== Law proposal to ban covert modeling of human appearance ===
<font color="red">'''Obs.'''</font> Should banning modeling people's appearance without explicit permission be pursued it must be <font color="green">formulated</font> so that this <font color="red">'''does not make'''</font> <big>'''[[Adequate Porn Watcher AI]]'''</big> <font color="red">illegal</font> / <font color="red">impossible</font>.

One would assume that collecting permissions to model each porn is not plausible, so the question is that can we ban covert modeling from non-pornographic pictures, while still retaining the ability to model all porn found on the Internet.

==== §1 Covert modeling of human appearance ==== 

'''Covertly acquiring''' 
::* A '''3D model'''
::* A '''[[Glossary#Bidirectional reflectance distribution function|7D bidirectional reflectance distribution function]]  model''' and similar in results, but technically different model
::* A '''direct-to-2D''' capable model and similar in results, but a technically different model

without '''without consent''' covert modeling of appearance is '''illegal'''. Also '''possession''', '''purchase''', '''sale''', '''yielding''', '''import''' and '''export''' of '''covert models''' are '''punishable'''.

==== §2 Aggravated covert modeling of human appearance ====
If a '''covert model''' of the '''head''' or the '''face''' is '''attached''' to a '''look-alike of a naked body''', regardless of whether that is '''synthetic''' or '''of human''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.

==== §3 Application of covert appearance models ====
'''Projection''' and '''making available''' media from covert models defined in §1 is '''punishable'''.

==== §4 Aggravated application of covert appearance models ====
If the projection is portrayed in a '''nude''' or '''sexual situation''' or used with the '''intent to frame for a crime''' or for '''blackmail''', the crime should be judged as '''aggravated'''.

----