Advice for judiciaries: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (deniability -> what should be deemed deniable) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (rm duplication of content + improve wordings + bolding) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable. | [[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable. | ||
Recordings that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | '''Recordings''' that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | ||
'''Pictures''' and '''videos''' that looks like someone doing something '''[[digital look-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I am not in that image/video.''" | |||
If '''[[Glossary#Media forensics|media forensics]]''' proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered evidence. | |||
Revision as of 15:18, 16 April 2019
Digital look-alikes and digital sound-alikes prompt some changes to w:rules of evidence and updates to what should be deemed deniable.
Recordings that sound like someone saying something may not be genuine and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "I did never say that thing you got on tape."
Pictures and videos that looks like someone doing something may not be genuine and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "I am not in that image/video."
If media forensics proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered evidence.