3,958
edits
Advice for judiciaries: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
rm duplication of content + improve wordings + bolding
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (deniability -> what should be deemed deniable) |
Juho Kunsola (talk | contribs) (rm duplication of content + improve wordings + bolding) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable. | [[Digital look-alikes]] and [[digital sound-alikes]] prompt some changes to [[w:Rules of evidence|w:rules of evidence]] and updates to what should be deemed deniable. | ||
Recordings that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | '''Recordings''' that sound like someone saying something '''[[digital sound-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I did never say that thing you got on tape.''" | ||
'''Pictures''' and '''videos''' that looks like someone doing something '''[[digital look-alikes|may not be genuine]]''' and therefore the suspect should be allowed to state to the court "''I am not in that image/video.''" | |||
If '''[[Glossary#Media forensics|media forensics]]''' proves beyond suspicion the genuinity of the media in question or if credible witness to its creation is found, the media should be considered evidence. | |||